Loading assurance state…
Loading latest synchronization record…
Automation that knows when not to approve.
AI Act Navigator separates source availability, content change and editorial risk. Safe changes can be automatically assured; material regulatory, certification, commercial and technical changes are isolated for editorial confirmation.
Deterministic first
Network status, hashes, structured evidence signals and freshness checks remain the primary controls. Optional semantic analysis can assist classification but cannot silently rewrite catalogue facts.
What can pass automatically
- Unchanged sources
- Cosmetic and navigation changes
- Non-material copy changes
- Reachable source changes with no material evidence signal
- Legacy source records being baselined by the new assurance engine
What remains reviewable
- Source availability failures
- Regulatory or AI Act claim changes
- Certification and attestation changes
- Pricing or commercial-model changes
- Material deployment, API or SDK capability changes
- Large unexplained content changes
Every automated decision leaves evidence
The review ledger records the vendor, monitored source, timestamp, previous and current hashes, detected change categories, decision and reason. A human-review queue is generated when the system cannot safely establish that a material claim remains valid.
Automated assurance is a data-quality control. It is not a legal certification, conformity assessment or statement that a vendor is legally compliant with the EU AI Act.